Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sep 11, 2005, at 07:44:35, [email protected] wrote:
I'll bite - what distros are shipping a kernel 2.6.10 or later and still
using devfs?

Debian.  The current Debian installer is unfortunately rather tightly
coupled to devfs; the reasons for choosing it are rooted in boot floppy size, but the development ("unstable") install image uses 2.6.12 + devfs.

I just had to do a little dance to install it on a machine where
2.6.12 didn't recognize the SATA controller but 2.6.13 counldn't
run the installer.

Note that Debian doesn't need devfs in normal operation; it's just
a bootstrapping tool.

That sounds like _exactly_ the case where the Debian folks could maintain
the out-of-tree ndevfs patch for a while until they got their installer
floppies and such migrated to udev.

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a18 C++++>$ UB/L/X/*++++(+)>$ P+++(++++)>$ L++++(+ ++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+ PGP+++ t+(+++) 5 X R?
tv-(--) b++++(++) DI+ D+ G e->++++$ h!*()>++$ r  !y?(-)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux