* Andi Kleen ([email protected]) wrote: > Jim Gifford <[email protected]> writes: > > I have been working on a project to create a Pure 64 bit distro of > > linux, nothing 32 bit in the system. I can accomplish that with no > > Hopefully you're using /lib64 for that, otherwise your > packages will be incompatible to everybody else and not > FHS compliant. If you don't please don't submit any > patches to hardcode this to upstream packages. /lib64 sucks, as mentioned, and I thought FHS only required that the linker be in /lib64. Thus, the actual libraries could be pretty much anywhere (as it should be, really). Debian-amd64 uses a symlink from /lib64 to /lib and provides the 64bit libraries and linker in /lib (but when actually compiling does link binaries through /lib64 for FHS compliance). Hopefully /lib64, et al, will die and multiarch will happen soon. Thanks, Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pure 64 bootloaders
- From: Stefan Smietanowski <[email protected]>
- Re: Pure 64 bootloaders
- References:
- Pure 64 bootloaders
- From: Jim Gifford <[email protected]>
- Re: Pure 64 bootloaders
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Pure 64 bootloaders
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 7/7] uml: retry host close() on EINTR
- Next by Date: Re: PCI bug in 2.6.13
- Previous by thread: Re: Pure 64 bootloaders
- Next by thread: Re: Pure 64 bootloaders
- Index(es):
