Re: [GIT PATCH] More PCI patches for 2.6.13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > But, aren't these arguments for changing the functions to return void?
> > If there is never any point in checking the results, then why have
> > results at all?
> 
> Trying to set other power states than D0 might return interesting values. 
> Also, you _can_ use the value to determine whether the device supports PM 
> states at all.

Perhaps we should make pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D0) to succeed in
case of old device not supporting power managment? As you've said, it
is effectively in PCI_D0 anyway ;-).
								Pavel

-- 
if you have sharp zaurus hardware you don't need... you know my address
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux