On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 07:44:54PM -0700, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> > this one completely duplicates the
> > mid-layer infrastructure for handling devices with Logical Units.
>
> No, it does *not*. James, you have _stop_ spreading FUD, relying
> that other people have not read the SCSI Core code.
>
> See here:
> SCSI Core has *no representation* of a SCSI Device with a
> SCSI Target Port.
struct scsi_target
> I've _clearly_ outlined that in the comments of the code,
> which you _conveniently_ did _not_ cut and paste here.
* Discover logical units present in the SCSI device. I'd like this
* to be moved to SCSI Core, but SCSI Core has no concept of a "SCSI
* device with a SCSI Target port". A SCSI device with a SCSI Target
* port is a device which the _transport_ found, but other than that,
* the transport has little or _no_ knowledge about the device.
* Ideally, a LLDD would register a "SCSI device with a SCSI Target
* port" with SCSI Core and then SCSI Core would do LU discovery of
* that device.
So what does this mean except "Luben tries to impress everyone with
standards gibberish, at the same time ignoring we soluitions that
work despite maybe not 100% elegant".
Sure, we'd like to move away from needing the ->id target id specifier.
But right now we need it, even you're code sets it in over-complicated
ways. But if you send a nice patch to get rid everyone will be happy.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |