On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:48:05PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Greg KH wrote:
>
> >Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:45:42 -0700
> >From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
> >To: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>, Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> >Cc: [email protected]
> >Subject: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.13
> >
> >Here are the same "delete devfs" patches that I submitted for 2.6.12.
> >It rips out all of devfs from the kernel and ends up saving a lot of
> >space. Since 2.6.13 came out, I have seen no complaints about the fact
> >that devfs was not able to be enabled anymore, and in fact, a lot of
> >different subsystems have already been deleting devfs support for a
> >while now, with apparently no complaints (due to the lack of users.)
>
> do you really think that there have been that many people who have shifted
> to 2.6.13 in less then 2 weeks since release?
Ok, how long should I wait then?
> I know that you take personal offense to this code existing, but Andrew
> pointed out when you proposed these patches before that we need to be
> acareful here
I know, that's fine. But if I don't keep trying, how will it ever
happen? :)
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |