Hi Roman.
> > kbuild looks for the Kbuild file before it looks for Makefile.
> > In a desire to move some of the functionality away form the top-level
> > Makefile and in to a kbuild file this is needed.
>
> Why don't you put it into scripts/Makefile...?
Because it does not build a build-support program.
That would be the last place where one would look for
rules to build asm-offsets.h for example.
When the functionalty to start the recursive build of all kernel
directories are moved to top-level Kbuild the location in the
top-level directory makes even more sense.
Same goes when the post processing steps are moved to the top-level
Kbuild file. Here we again will benefit form having the full kbuild
funtionality available.
> > The Kbuild file in the top-level directory will take
> > over more and more functionality from the top-level
> > Makefile to the extent that I hope to end up with two
> > readable files.
>
> If the top-level Makefile gets to big, we can move things into scripts/,
> that's really no reason to start using Kbuild, in the end it's still a
> Makefile and I'd prefer to call it like that.
A makefile is a file that does something intelligent when used as input
to make. It is long time since this property did not hold for the
kernel.
The Kbuild name is a much more natural name in the respect that it
tells you this file contain kbuild info. So one know when browsing
a directory structure that a Kbuild file is input to kbuild, and follow
a much more strict syntax than ordinary Makefiles.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|