[1/3] {PREFIX:-x86_64}: Fix MPOL_F_VERIFY

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fix MPOL_F_VERIFY

There was a pretty bad bug in there that the code would
always check the full VMA, not the range the user requested.

When the VMA to be checked was merged with the previous VMA this
could lead to spurious failures.

Index: linux-2.6.13-work/mm/mempolicy.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.13-work.orig/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ linux-2.6.13-work/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -338,8 +338,13 @@ check_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsign
 		if (prev && prev->vm_end < vma->vm_start)
 			return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
 		if ((flags & MPOL_MF_STRICT) && !is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)) {
+			unsigned long endvma = vma->vm_end; 
+			if (endvma > end)
+				endvma = end;
+			if (vma->vm_start > start)
+				start = vma->vm_start;
 			err = check_pgd_range(vma->vm_mm,
-					   vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, nodes);
+					   start, endvma, nodes);
 			if (err) {
 				first = ERR_PTR(err);
 				break;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux