On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:42:06AM -0700, Jim Gifford wrote:
> I have been working on a project to create a Pure 64 bit distro of
> linux, nothing 32 bit in the system. I can accomplish that with no
> issues pretty much on all platforms, with the exception of the
> bootloaders. It just seems odd, that all the bootloaders seem to have
> gcc -m32 in their makefiles.
>
> Silo on the Sparc has gcc -m32
> Grub on the x86 platforms has gcc -m32
>
> The only one that builds and works is Lilo, which most people are moving
> away from.
>
> So for my question, why does a bootloader have to be 32bit?
> Anyone got 64 bit bootloaders for Sparc or x86_64 machines?
> Are there technical limitations that bootloaders can't be 64 bit?
> If we can't have a pure64 environment, why does the Kernel support it?
It depends on the mode the CPU is in, at boot time. Also, there are size
constraints, as 64-bit code is usually larger.
There's nothing stopping you from writing a bootloader that immediately
put the CPU into 64-bit mode, and then proceeds from there...
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |