Chris wrote:
> OK, we can hold until you find a good case for triggering ;-)
Agreed.
By the way, you or Randy mentioned something about leaving a mention of
-stable in the MAINTAINERS file.
That wouldn't have helped me this week, but if you had put the string:
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
somewhere in the opening text of the messages that announce stable
reviews, that would have saved me some time. I have in mind the
lkml messages such as:
From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH 0/9] -stable review
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.13.1 release.
Just a thought ...
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |