Re: [PATCH 2.6.13] lockless pagecache 7/7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


For Itanium (and I guess also for ppc64 and sparch64) the performance of 
write_lock/unlock is the same as spin_lock/unlock. There is at least 
one case where concurrent reads would be allowed without this patch. 

Maybe keep the rwlock_t there?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux