Re: [discuss] [PATCH] allow CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for x86-64

On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Friday 09 September 2005 13:31, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > But kdb should be using a dwarf2 unwinder instead. kgdb certainly
> > > supports that, as does NLKD.
> >
> > In an ideal and bloat-neutral world.  I've always imagined it to be
> > quite a lot of work, bringing in its own set of problems: but great
> > that that work has now been done, and yes, it might one day get
> > ported to kdb.  But removing "&& !X86_64" is much easier.
> 
> Hmm ok. I will do that change.

Thanks, Andi.

Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] allow CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for x86-64
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [discuss] [PATCH] allow CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for x86-64
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [discuss] [PATCH] allow CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for x86-64
    • From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
  • Re: [discuss] [PATCH] allow CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for x86-64
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: do_vfs_lock: VFS is out of sync with lock manager!
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/25] NTFS: Allow highmem kmalloc() in ntfs_malloc_nofs() and add _nofail() version.
• Previous by thread: Re: [discuss] [PATCH] allow CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for x86-64
• Next by thread: Re: [discuss] [PATCH] allow CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for x86-64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]