Re: [discuss] [PATCH] allow CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for x86-64

On Friday 09 September 2005 11:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Andi Kleen <[email protected]> 09.09.05 10:54:11 >>>
> >
> >On Thursday 08 September 2005 18:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> (Note: Patch also attached because the inline version is certain to
>
> get
>
> >> line wrapped.)
> >>
> >> Allow building the x86-64 kernels with frame pointers if so needed.
> >
> >This doesn't work because you would need to pass
>
> -fno-omit-frame-pointer
>
> >somewhere.
>
> So is done in the top-level makefile.

Indeed. Someone must have fixed it.  But why would anyone want frame pointers
on x86-64?

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [discuss] [PATCH] allow CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for x86-64
  - From: Philippe Elie <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] [PATCH] allow CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for x86-64
  - From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] allow CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for x86-64
  - From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] [PATCH] allow CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for x86-64
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] [PATCH] allow CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for x86-64
  - From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH 10/25] NTFS: Fix a bug in fs/ntfs/index.c::ntfs_index_lookup().
Next by Date: [PATCH 9/25] NTFS: Add ntfs_rl_punch_nolock() which punches a caller specified hole into a runlist.
Previous by thread: Re: [discuss] [PATCH] allow CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for x86-64
Next by thread: Re: [discuss] [PATCH] allow CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for x86-64
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]