Re: [discuss] [PATCH] add and handle NMI_VECTOR II

On Friday 09 September 2005 09:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Andi Kleen <[email protected]> 09.09.05 09:14:07 >>>
> >>
> >> ??? This is what the code doing the setup does. But the question was
>
> -
>
> >> what do you need the IDT entry for?
> >
> >Without an IDT entry you cannot receive it?
>
> But that's the point - if it's delivered as an NMI, it'll arrive
> through vector 2 (the vector information specified is ignored).

Good point. I wonder how this ever worked. I'll remove it.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] add and handle NMI_VECTOR
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [discuss] [PATCH] add and handle NMI_VECTOR II
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [discuss] [PATCH] add and handle NMI_VECTOR II
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] fix i386 double fault handler
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13] x86_64: Add notify_die() to another spot in do_page_fault()
• Previous by thread: Re: [discuss] [PATCH] add and handle NMI_VECTOR II
• Next by thread: Re: [discuss] [PATCH] add and handle NMI_VECTOR
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]