On Sep 8, 2005, at 6:56 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 16:11 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Merged tlb.h between asm-ppc32 and asm-ppc64 into asm-powerpc. Also,
fixed
a compiler warning in arch/ppc/mm/tlb.c since it was roughly related.
Signed-off-by: Kumar K. Gala <[email protected]>
Do we want to do that ?
Replacing 2 different files with one split in #ifdef isn't a
progress...
As I said, I think we need two subdirs for the low level stuffs
that is
different, and that includes at this point all of the memory
management
related stuff.
I understand, but I'm also not sure if its progress to duplicate a
major of a file that is common.
In this case it might be better handled by having specific versions
per "sub-arch". I think the key is determining which files should be
handled via sub-arch diffs and which should be handled via ifdef's in
the file.
Some cases like ppc_asm are so similar that it seems better to have a
single file and ifdef the specific case.
In addition, I'd appreciate if we could avoid touching ppc64 mm
related
files completely for a couple of weeks as I'm working on a fairly big
patch that I'm really tired of having to rebase all the time ;)
Will avoid touch any other mm related headers than :)
- kumar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |