Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS

Dinakar wrote:
> Cross posting this to ckrm-tech as well.

Good idea - thanks.

Hopefully Takahiro-san and the CKRM folks can reach an understanding
on how their two proposals relate.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
  - From: KUROSAWA Takahiro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
  - From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
  - From: Dinakar Guniguntala <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] adjust .version updating
Next by Date: [PATCH] i386 CFI annotations
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]