Parag Warudkar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> >Hmm - not many x86-64 patches in mm1. 2.6.13 definitely works.
> >
> >
> 2.6.13-git7 works. So something in -mm has gone bad (if not x86_64, may
> be i386 or arch-independent changes?)
> It seems it has got something to do with the sys_set_tid_address as
> evident from the strace output below.
> Another thing - If I set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4 and then run the binary,
> it works fine.
I can't reproduce this with the current -mm lineup. I compiled up a 32-bit
app on x86 and transferred that across.
Maybe it got fixed. Please test 2.6.13-mm2, which appears to be an hour or
two away. If it still fails then I'd need a recipe (including URLs and
stuff) with which to reproduce it please.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |