Re: 2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault

On Thursday 08 September 2005 07:10, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >Hmm - not many x86-64 patches in mm1. 2.6.13 definitely works.
>
> 2.6.13-git7 works. So something in -mm has gone bad (if not x86_64, may
> be i386 or arch-independent changes?)
> It seems it has got something to do with the sys_set_tid_address as
> evident from the strace output below.

If you catch a crash in gdb and type x/i $pc what do you see?

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault
    • From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • 2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault
    • From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault
    • From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 4/5] SUBCPUSETS: CPU resource controller
• Next by Date: [PATCH 2.6.13 2/4] Cleanup - remove unnecessary handle_IRQ_event() prototype (ppc)
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]