Re: [RFC][PATCH 1 of 4] Configfs is really sysfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:54:45PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
> 	Finally, assuming that the sysfs_dirent/configfs_dirent
> arrangement is pretty fleshed out, I think that perhaps this backing
> store could be joined.  Again, no more magic could be added, and it
> would have to handle the sysfs and configfs types in concurrence, but I
> think it could be done.  Again, sysfs folks, please comment.

Thanks for the good explainations.  I still agree with Joel that these
need to be separate fses.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux