--- Bill Davidsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Alex Davis wrote:
> >>Please don't tell me to "care for closed-source drivers".
> >
> > ndiswrapper is NOT closed source. And I'm not asking you to "care".
> >
> >
> >>I don't want the pain of debugging crashes on the machines which run unknown code
> >>in kernel space.
> >
> > I'm not asking you to debug crashes. I'm simply requesting that the
> > kernel stack size situation remain as it is: with 8K as the default
> > and 4K configurable.
>
> I can be happy with 4K as the default, everything I use *except*
> ndiswrapper seems to run fine (I don't currently need fancy filesystems)
> but laptops seem to include a lot of unsupported hardware, which can't
> be replaced due to resources (money, slots, batter life).
> --
I could live with any default, as long as it's configurable.
The intent here, however, is to take away the option. That's
what I have an issue with.
Is there any problem caused by letting stack size be
configurable to any (sane) arbitrary maximum value
(e.g. 32K)?
> -bill davidsen ([email protected])
> "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
> last possible moment - but no longer" -me
>
I code, therefore I am
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |