Hi Jeff,
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> David S. Miller wrote:
> > From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
> > Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 21:51:21 -0400
> >
> >>NAK. Rationale: maintainer's choice. Pavel doesn't get to choose
> >>the debugger of choice for the driver maintainer.
> >
> > If it makes the driver unreadable and thus harder to maintain,
> > I think such changes should seriously be considered.
> >
> > Most of the DEBUG_INFO macro usage is fine, but those "enter"
> > and "exit" ones are just pure noise and should be removed.
>
> I find them useful in my own drivers; they are definitely not pure noise.
gcc -finstrument-functions
can do that completely without adding noise to the sources.
been there, done that. With a gcc-patch you don't even need to
resolve symbols.
Regards
Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |