Re: kbuild & C++

• To: "Budde, Marco" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: kbuild & C++
• From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
• Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:15:45 +1000
• Cc: Bernd Petrovitsch <[email protected]>, [email protected]
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=j4hmKqIO4tclkFk1dj48WIERjfCtCN0aWPUSWHD4z6ZJQnJPugAmsZmZcQd3TQpMD0ApEP83gZY14rk9FI4R0XaU8rOpkOLOuxjvDRhSqY7BuE2zD6ep6Cxe9DYX2LDrMqtPMHDdryPLcCVMB74CganEGlZmV+UmqfSKgBHgYvs= ;
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>
• Sender: [email protected]
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050802 Debian/1.7.10-1

Budde, Marco wrote:

make life more difficult. If you do not like any kind of abstraction,
why are you using C instead of pure assembler?

This has nothing to do with the linux kernel anymore, so can the
thread be killed from lkml please? (Not to be rude; understand
the s/n ratio is bad at the best of times).

Thanks,
Nick

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • RE: kbuild & C++
    • From: "Budde, Marco" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: kbuild & C++
• Next by Date: Re: 'virtual HW' into kernel (SystemC)
• Previous by thread: RE: kbuild & C++
• Next by thread: RE: kbuild & C++
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]