Re: proto_unregister sleeps while atomic

From: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 01:42:48 +0200

> The only other user of proto_list besides proto_register, which
> doesn't care, are the seqfs functions. They use the slab pointer,
> but in a harmless way:
> 
>                     proto->slab == NULL ? "no" : "yes",
> 
> Anyway, I've moved it up to the top.

Ok thanks, patch applied.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: proto_unregister sleeps while atomic
    • From: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
  • Re: proto_unregister sleeps while atomic
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
  • Re: proto_unregister sleeps while atomic
    • From: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/1] ipw2100: remove by-hand function entry/exit debugging
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 1/1] ipw2100: remove by-hand function entry/exit debugging
• Previous by thread: Re: proto_unregister sleeps while atomic
• Next by thread: [PATCH] PPC64: large INITRD causes kernel not to boot [UPDATE]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]