Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sep 5, 2005, at 18:32:32, Thorild Selen wrote:
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> writes:
Please name situations where 8K stacks may be preferred that do not
involve binary-only modules.

How about NFS-exporting a filesystem on LVM atop md?  I believe it has
been mentioned before in discussions that 8k stacks are strongly
recommended in this case.  Are those issues solved?

I think the worst overflow case anyone found was nfs=>xfs=>lvm=>dm=>scsi, if someone has such a configuration, please retest with current -mm or similar. I think there are several patches in there to resolve the excessive stack usage and a few to do some sort of bio chaining (Instead of recursive calls). I don't remember what underlying hardware was behind the SCSI, but I suspect something like iSCSI or USB would push some extra stack in there for stress
testing.

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett

--
I have yet to see any problem, however complicated, which, when you looked at
it in the right way, did not become still more complicated.
  -- Poul Anderson



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux