On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, David Howells wrote:
> The comment attached to the drop-in replacement patch is wrong:
Indeed it is. Good thing Andrew doesn't seem to have dropped
it in ;)
> | +static inline int sem_is_read_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> | +{
> | + return (sem->count != 0);
> | +}
> | +
>
> This uses the function wrong name. And:
Argh. That should be rwsem_is_locked of course...
> Is inconsistent, though the tests are valid.
I fixed that one in a separate patch.
--
All Rights Reversed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |