Re: [PATCH][1/2] fix for -mm add-sem_is_read-write_locked.patch

[Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>]

On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, David Howells wrote:

> The comment attached to the drop-in replacement patch is wrong:

Indeed it is.  Good thing Andrew doesn't seem to have dropped
it in ;)

> | +static inline int sem_is_read_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> | +{
> | +	return (sem->count != 0);
> | +}
> | +
> 
> This uses the function wrong name. And:

Argh.  That should be rwsem_is_locked of course...

> Is inconsistent, though the tests are valid.

I fixed that one in a separate patch.

-- 
All Rights Reversed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/