On 9/5/05, David Teigland <[email protected]> wrote:
> Either set could be trivially removed. It's such an insignificant issue
> that I've removed glock_hold and put. For the record,
>
> within glock.c we consistently paired inlined versions of:
> glock_hold()
> glock_put()
>
> we wanted external versions to be appropriately named so we had:
> gfs2_glock_hold()
> gfs2_glock_put()
>
> still not sure if that technique is acceptable in this crowd or not.
You still didn't answer my question why you needed two versions,
though. AFAIK you didn't which makes the other one an redundant
wrapper which are discouraged in kernel code.
Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |