R: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

> Giampaolo,
> 
> Should read: ...even if the ATMSAR actually lacks of AAL1, AAL2 
> and AAL3/4 [where AAL3/4 is obsolete] capabilities...
> 
> Just wanted to make it more precise according to the ATM 
> standards, this was the only intention of my "patch".

You're right. Sorry about that.

Thanks,
	
	Giampaolo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1
    • From: Zoran Stojsavljevic <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS
• Next by Date: Re: GFS, what's remaining
• Previous by thread: Re: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1
• Next by thread: Re: [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]