R: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

> Giampaolo,
> 
> Should read: ...even if the ATMSAR actually lacks of AAL1, AAL2 
> and AAL3/4 [where AAL3/4 is obsolete] capabilities...
> 
> Just wanted to make it more precise according to the ATM 
> standards, this was the only intention of my "patch".

You're right. Sorry about that.

Thanks,
	
	Giampaolo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1
  - From: Zoran Stojsavljevic <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS
Next by Date: Re: GFS, what's remaining
Previous by thread: Re: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1
Next by thread: Re: [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]