Re: [DVB patch 54/54] ttusb-budget: use time_after_eq()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> > > On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > -static int numpkt = 0, lastj, numts, numstuff, numsec, numinvalid;
> > > > +static int numpkt = 0, numts, numstuff, numsec, numinvalid;
> > > > +static unsigned long lastj;
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think you actually want:
> > >
> > > static void ttusb_iso_irq(....)
> > > {
> > >      unsigned long lastj;
> > >
> > 
> > The code in question is used to print a one-per-second debug output,
> > and lastj is assigned after every print.
> 
> Ah yes, didn't see that in the current code, sorry for that noise.
> Still, lastj is local to ttusb_iso_irq(), right?

Yes, but it needs to be static.

Johannes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux