Adrian Bunk wrote (ao):
> 4Kb kernel stacks are the future on i386, and it seems the problems it
> initially caused are now sorted out.
>
> Does anyone knows about any currently unsolved problems?
>
> I'd like to:
> - get a patch into on of the next -mm kernels that unconditionally
> enables 4KSTACKS
> - if there won't be new reports of breakages, send a patch to
> completely remove !4KSTACKS for 2.6.15
>
> In -mm, Reiser4 still has a dependency on !4KSTACKS.
> I've mentioned this at least twice to the Reiser4 people, and they
> should check why this dependency is still there and if there are still
> stack issues in Reiser4 fix them.
>
> If not people using Reiser4 on i386 will have to decide whether to
> switch the filesystem or the architecture...
FWIW: I use Reiser4 for several months now on several i386 systems, and
I always remove the "&& !4STACKS" from fs/reiser4/Kconfig and enable
CONFIG_4KSTACKS:
# zgrep -E 'REISER4|4KSTACKS' /proc/config.gz
CONFIG_REISER4_FS=y
# CONFIG_REISER4_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_4KSTACKS=y
Also using lvm2, or raid1, or raid5, on ATA, SATA or SCSI. I haven't
experienced any problems yet, but the systems don't see heavy usage too.
Kind regards, Sander
--
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |