Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 02 September 2005 04:08, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > I suppose I'll queue it up in -mm for a while, although I'm a bit dubious
> > about the whole idea...  We'll gain some and we'll lose some - how do we
> > know it's a net gain?
> 
> I suspect it'll gain more than it loses. The only case where it might 
> not gain is immediately someone reading the data from the page cache again
> after the write.

That's a pretty common case - temporary files.

> But I suppose that's far less frequent than writing the data.

yup.

Hiro, could you please send through a summary of the performance testing
results sometime?  Runtimes rather than oprofile output?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux