Re: [PATCH 0/10] m68k/thread_info merge

Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Can I assume that the five m68k patches can be split apart from the five
> patches which dink with task_struct?  ie: if the task_struct patches go in
> later, does anything bad happen?

eh, forget I asked that.  They're interdependent.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/10] m68k/thread_info merge
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/10] m68k/thread_info merge
    • From: [email protected]

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/10] m68k/thread_info merge
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/10] m68k/thread_info merge
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/10] m68k/thread_info merge
• Next by Date: [PATCH] via82cxxx IDE: Support multiple controllers
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/10] m68k/thread_info merge
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/10] m68k/thread_info merge
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]