RE: [RFC/PATCH]reconfigure MSI registers after resume

On Thursday, September 01, 2005 1:10 PM Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, September 01, 2005 12:32 PM Andrew Morton wrote:
>> > So what is the alternative to Shaohua's fix?  Restore all the msi 
>> > registers on resume?
>> 
>> Yes, the PCIe port bus driver, for example, did that.
>> 

> So you're saying that each individual driver which uses MSI is
responsible
> for the restore?  
Yes.

> Is it not possible to do this in some single centralized place?
Existing pci_save_state(dev)/pci_restore_state(dev) covers only 64 bytes
of PCI header. One solution is to extend these APIs to cover up to 256
bytes. What do you think?

Thanks,
Tom
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC/PATCH]reconfigure MSI registers after resume
    • From: Rajesh Shah <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC/PATCH]reconfigure MSI registers after resume
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.13-mm1
• Next by Date: [RFC][PATCH] Use proper casting with signed timespec.tv_nsec values
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH]reconfigure MSI registers after resume
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH]reconfigure MSI registers after resume
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]