On 9/1/05, Jim Gettys <[email protected]> wrote:
> Not at all.
>
> We're pursuing two courses of action right now, that are not mutually
> exclusive.
>
> Jon Smirl's argument is that we can satisfy both needs simultaneously
> with a GL only strategy, and that doing two is counter productive,
> primarily on available resource grounds.
>
> My point is that I don't think the case has (yet) been made to put all
> eggs into that one basket, and that some of the arguments presented for
> that course of action don't hold together.
We're not putting all of our eggs in one basket, you keep forgetting
that we already have a server that supports all of the currently
existing hardware. The question is where do we want to put our future
eggs.
--
Jon Smirl
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |