Re: [PATCH 1/3] Updated dynamic tick patches - Fix lost tick

[Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>]

On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:05:23PM +0200, Thomas Schlichter wrote:
> Yes, the only real differences are the two points mentioned in my first 
> mail... I only wanted to help you fixing these.

Thanks for pointing them out. I have fixed it in the experimental version
that I have now.

> Well, that seems to be fine. If you want somebody to have a look over your 
> final patch, feel free to mail me...

sure!

> I should have defined PMTMR_TICKS_PER_JIFFY like you assigned 
> pm_ticks_per_jiffy (why did you use a static and constant variable and not a 
> macro?):

I actually started with using the calibrated value of PMTMR_TICKS_PER_JIFFY 
rather than compile time constant (as found in verify_pmtmr), but later dropped
the idea since I didnt get good results with it. After that didnt revert
back pm_ticks_per_jiffy to be a macro. But good point, will include
this in the next patch that I am trying out. Will post it if I happen
to have success :)



-- 


Thanks and Regards,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM Software Labs,
Bangalore, INDIA - 560017
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/