On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:05:23PM +0200, Thomas Schlichter wrote:
> Yes, the only real differences are the two points mentioned in my first
> mail... I only wanted to help you fixing these.
Thanks for pointing them out. I have fixed it in the experimental version
that I have now.
> Well, that seems to be fine. If you want somebody to have a look over your
> final patch, feel free to mail me...
sure!
> I should have defined PMTMR_TICKS_PER_JIFFY like you assigned
> pm_ticks_per_jiffy (why did you use a static and constant variable and not a
> macro?):
I actually started with using the calibrated value of PMTMR_TICKS_PER_JIFFY
rather than compile time constant (as found in verify_pmtmr), but later dropped
the idea since I didnt get good results with it. After that didnt revert
back pm_ticks_per_jiffy to be a macro. But good point, will include
this in the next patch that I am trying out. Will post it if I happen
to have success :)
--
Thanks and Regards,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM Software Labs,
Bangalore, INDIA - 560017
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |