Em Qua, 2005-08-31 às 13:56 -0700, Greg KH escreveu:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:34:58PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Ter, 2005-08-30 ?s 23:20 +0200, Jean Delvare escreveu:
> > > Hi Mauro,
> > >
> > > > (...) it would be nice not to have a different I2C
> > > > API for every single 2.6 version :-) It would be nice to change I2C
> > > > API once and keep it stable for a while.
> >
> > > The Linux 2.6 development model is designed around a relatively fast
> > > move from -mm to Linus' tree, which implies incremental changes all the
> > > time. I'm only doing that.
> > It is ok to change code, but, IMHO, API should be more stable.
>
> I take it you have not read Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt yet?
No I din't :-)
> If not, please do, it shows that what you are asking for will not
> happen.
I was not asking for a 'stable' one.. but a less variant... anyway, I
can survive with this policy ;-)
>
> good luck,
>
> greg k-h
>
Cheers,
Mauro.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |