Re: [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Drop I2C_DEVNAME and i2c_clientname

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@brturbo.com.br>]

Em Qua, 2005-08-31 às 13:56 -0700, Greg KH escreveu:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:34:58PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Ter, 2005-08-30 ?s 23:20 +0200, Jean Delvare escreveu:
> > > Hi Mauro,
> > > 
> > > > (...) it would be nice not to have a different I2C
> > > > API for every single 2.6 version :-) It would be nice to change I2C
> > > > API once and keep it stable for a while.
> > 
> > > The Linux 2.6 development model is designed around a relatively fast
> > > move from -mm to Linus' tree, which implies incremental changes all the
> > > time. I'm only doing that.
> > 	It is ok to change code, but, IMHO, API should be more stable.
> 
> I take it you have not read Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt yet?
	No I din't :-)
> If not, please do, it shows that what you are asking for will not
> happen.
	I was not asking for a 'stable' one.. but a less variant... anyway, I
can survive with this policy ;-)
> 
> good luck,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
Cheers, 
Mauro.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/