Re: Where is the performance bottleneck?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Nick Piggin wrote:

Holger Kiehl wrote:

meminfo.dump:

   MemTotal:      8124172 kB
   MemFree:         23564 kB
   Buffers:       7825944 kB
   Cached:          19216 kB
   SwapCached:          0 kB
   Active:          25708 kB
   Inactive:      7835548 kB
   HighTotal:           0 kB
   HighFree:            0 kB
   LowTotal:      8124172 kB
   LowFree:         23564 kB
   SwapTotal:    15631160 kB
   SwapFree:     15631160 kB
   Dirty:         3145604 kB

Hmm OK, dirty memory is pinned pretty much exactly on dirty_ratio
so maybe I've just led you on a goose chase.

You could
   echo 5 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio
   echo 10 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio

To further reduce dirty memory in the system, however this is
a long shot, so please continue your interaction with the
other people in the thread first.

Yes, this does make a difference, here the results of running

  dd if=/dev/full of=/dev/sd?1 bs=4M count=4883

on 8 disks at the same time:

  34.273340
  33.938829
  33.598469
  32.970575
  32.841351
  32.723988
  31.559880
  29.778112

That's 32.710568 MB/s on average per disk with your change and without
it it was 24.958557 MB/s on average per disk.

I will do more tests tomorrow.

Thanks,
Holger

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux