Re: [FYI] 2.6.13-rt3 and a nanosleep jitter test.

No problem .. There are some other tests in there though .. I've been
using them for stress testing .. Apparently you don't need HRT on to use
them either.

Daniel

On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 11:19 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 08:13 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > Sorry, that's http://high-res-timers.sf.net/
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> But I always seem to prefer to rewrite the wheel than to use one that
> already exists. ;-)  Probably explains why my cars are always in the
> shop!
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: 2.6.13-rc6-rt6
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- [RFC] RT-patch update to remove the global pi_lock
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] RT-patch update to remove the global pi_lock
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] RT-patch update to remove the global pi_lock
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] RT-patch update to remove the global pi_lock
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] RT-patch update to remove the global pi_lock
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] RT-patch update to remove the global pi_lock
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] RT-patch update to remove the global pi_lock
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] RT-patch update to remove the global pi_lock
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] RT-patch update to remove the global pi_lock
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- [FYI] 2.6.13-rt3 and a nanosleep jitter test.
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [FYI] 2.6.13-rt3 and a nanosleep jitter test.
  - From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [FYI] 2.6.13-rt3 and a nanosleep jitter test.
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [FYI] 2.6.13-rt3 and a nanosleep jitter test.
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Drop I2C_DEVNAME and i2c_clientname
Previous by thread: Re: [FYI] 2.6.13-rt3 and a nanosleep jitter test.
Next by thread: Re: [FYI] 2.6.13-rt3 and a nanosleep jitter test.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]