Re: [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #3

On 8/31/05, Machida, Hiroyuki <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Please consider moving this check to callers. Conditional allocation
> > makes this bit strange API-wise. Or alternatively, give
> > hint_allocate() a better name.
> 
> How about hint_allocate_conditional() ?

hint_get() sounds better to me.

                        Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RFC][FAT] diren scan profiling report
  - From: "Machida, Hiroyuki" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #2
  - From: "Machida, Hiroyuki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #2
  - From: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
- [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #3
  - From: "Machida, Hiroyuki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #3
  - From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #3
  - From: "Machida, Hiroyuki" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #3
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #3
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #3
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]