Re: [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #3

On 8/31/05, Machida, Hiroyuki <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Please consider moving this check to callers. Conditional allocation
> > makes this bit strange API-wise. Or alternatively, give
> > hint_allocate() a better name.
> 
> How about hint_allocate_conditional() ?

hint_get() sounds better to me.

                        Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC][FAT] diren scan profiling report
    • From: "Machida, Hiroyuki" <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #2
    • From: "Machida, Hiroyuki" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #2
    • From: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #3
    • From: "Machida, Hiroyuki" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #3
    • From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #3
    • From: "Machida, Hiroyuki" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #3
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #3
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #3
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][FAT] FAT dirent scan with hin take #3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]