Re: [PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:45:54PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> 
> I've posted similar patches in the past, but was asked to first until the
> short-circuit patch moved from -mm to mainline - and since it is now 
> firmly there in 2.6.13 I assume there's no problem there anymore.
> I was also asked previously to make the patch against mainline and not -mm,
> so this patch is against 2.6.13.

Thanks for you work and patience Jesper, this patch looks good to me.

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL
  - From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Where is the performance bottleneck?
Next by Date: Re: strange CPU speedups with SMP on Athlon 64 X2
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL
Next by thread: GDT initialization and location question.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]