Florian Weimer <[email protected]> wrote: -> > the problem with openbsd version of the hal is that it is - sorry to -> > say that - fundamentally broken, at least it was last time I was -> > checking. -> -> It's better than nothing, that is, it worked for us when we gave it a -> try. And it seems to be relatively unencumbered. ok, maybe it sounded to harsh. What I really meant was that when I was doing my research on the atheros chipset I revealed some differences between what is actually in HAL and what is in openbsd driver. It could have been due to the update schedule of madwifi. It is always easier to be up to date with the vendor supported driver than with reverse engineered one. Anyways what I saw was that some parts were missing in openbsd. I don't know how much in overall. Mateusz -- @..@ Mateusz Berezecki (----) [email protected] http://mateusz.agrest.org ( >__< ) PGP: 5F1C 86DF 89DB BFE9 899E 8CBE EB60 B7A7 43F9 5808 ^^ ~~ ^^
Attachment:
pgpSEJlZybChl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: Atheros and rt2x00 driver
- From: Daniel J Blueman <[email protected]>
- Re: Atheros and rt2x00 driver
- From: Mateusz Berezecki <[email protected]>
- Re: Atheros and rt2x00 driver
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: Atheros and rt2x00 driver
- From: Florian Weimer <[email protected]>
- Re: Atheros and rt2x00 driver
- From: Mateusz Berezecki <[email protected]>
- Re: Atheros and rt2x00 driver
- From: Florian Weimer <[email protected]>
- Re: Atheros and rt2x00 driver
- Prev by Date: Re: serial port multiplexing
- Next by Date: Re: Atheros and rt2x00 driver
- Previous by thread: Re: Atheros and rt2x00 driver
- Next by thread: Re: Atheros and rt2x00 driver
- Index(es):