Hi Paul- > I'm suggesting that the rpaphp code has a struct pci_driver whose > id_table and probe function are such that it will claim the EADS > bridges. (It would probably be best to match on vendor=IBM and > class=PCI-PCI bridge and let the probe function figure out which of > the bridges it gets asked about are actually EADS bridges.) Wouldn't this leave out hotplug-capable adapters who have direct PHB parents, since these parent PHBs don't have pci_devs? Thoughts? Thanks- John - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [patch 8/8] PCI Error Recovery: PPC64 core recovery routines
- From: Linas Vepstas <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 8/8] PCI Error Recovery: PPC64 core recovery routines
- From: John Rose <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 8/8] PCI Error Recovery: PPC64 core recovery routines
- From: Linas Vepstas <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 8/8] PCI Error Recovery: PPC64 core recovery routines
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 8/8] PCI Error Recovery: PPC64 core recovery routines
- From: Linas Vepstas <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 8/8] PCI Error Recovery: PPC64 core recovery routines
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 8/8] PCI Error Recovery: PPC64 core recovery routines
- From: Linas Vepstas <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 8/8] PCI Error Recovery: PPC64 core recovery routines
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- [patch 8/8] PCI Error Recovery: PPC64 core recovery routines
- Prev by Date: Re: State of Linux graphics
- Next by Date: Re: LSM root_plug module questions
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 8/8] PCI Error Recovery: PPC64 core recovery routines
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 8/8] PCI Error Recovery: PPC64 core recovery routines
- Index(es):
