Re: [PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:45:54PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> Since the patch to add a NULL short-circuit to crypto_free_tfm() went in, 
> there's no longer any need for callers of that function to check for NULL.
...
> Feedback, ACK, NACK, etc welcome. 

I've no problem with the auth_gss or nfsv4 bits.--b.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Very strange Marvell/Yukon Gigabit NIC networking problems
• Next by Date: GDT initialization and location question.
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]