Re: [PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:45:54PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> Since the patch to add a NULL short-circuit to crypto_free_tfm() went in, 
> there's no longer any need for callers of that function to check for NULL.
...
> Feedback, ACK, NACK, etc welcome. 

I've no problem with the auth_gss or nfsv4 bits.--b.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL
  - From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Very strange Marvell/Yukon Gigabit NIC networking problems
Next by Date: GDT initialization and location question.
Previous by thread: [PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]