Re: [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Drop I2C_DEVNAME and i2c_clientname

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 09:12:42PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> 
> 	I have a question for you about I2C: why i2c_driver doesn't have a
> generic pointer to keep priv data (like i2c_adapter) ? 

Because no one has sent in a patch to add it :)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Drop I2C_DEVNAME and i2c_clientname
    • From: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Drop I2C_DEVNAME and i2c_clientname
    • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Drop I2C_DEVNAME and i2c_clientname
    • From: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Drop I2C_DEVNAME and i2c_clientname
    • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Kernel 2.6.13: TCP (libnet?)
• Next by Date: inotify and IN_UNMOUNT-events
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Drop I2C_DEVNAME and i2c_clientname
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Drop I2C_DEVNAME and i2c_clientname
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]