Re: Trailing comments in broken-out series file break quilt

Hi Paul,

> However the quilt command passes these additional terms to the patch
> command as additional arguments, confusing the heck out of patch,
> and generating an error message that confused the heck out of me.
> 
> Question - should I be asking Andrew not to comment this way, or
> should I be asking quilt to recognize a comment convention here?

You should simply be using an up-to-date version of quilt, namely
version 0.42, which supports Andrew-style comments in series files just
fine.

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Trailing comments in broken-out series file break quilt
  - From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

References:
- Trailing comments in broken-out series file break quilt
  - From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.13 - 1/3 - Remove the deprecated function __check_region
Next by Date: Re: Where is the performance bottleneck?
Previous by thread: Re: Trailing comments in broken-out series file break quilt
Next by thread: Re: Trailing comments in broken-out series file break quilt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]