On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:03:35AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
>
> >+swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev,
> >+swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_device(struct device *hwdev,
>
> Huh? These look identical ... same args, same code, just a
> different name.
Have you looked at the implementations for swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu
and swiotlb_sync_single_for_device? Those are already identical.
I'm just following the existing style/practice in that file. I could
do an additional patch to rectify the replication in those functions
if you'd like?
Who is responsible for the swiotlb code?
John
--
John W. Linville
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |