Re: [PATCH] Only process_die notifier in ia64_do_page_fault if KPROBES is configured.

On Tuesday 30 August 2005 02:19, Rusty Lynch wrote:

>
> So, assuming inlining the notifier_call_chain would address Christoph's
> conserns, is the following patch something like what you are sugesting?

Yes.

Well in theory you could make fast and slow notify_die too, but that's
probably not worth it.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] Only process_die notifier in ia64_do_page_fault if KPROBES is configured.
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Only process_die notifier in ia64_do_page_fault if KPROBES is configured.
    • From: Rusty Lynch <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 16/16] Add hardware breakpoint support for i386
• Next by Date: Re: [discuss] Re: [patch 2.6.13] x86_64: implement dma_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device}
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Only process_die notifier in ia64_do_page_fault if KPROBES is configured.
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Only process_die notifier in ia64_do_page_fault if KPROBES is configured.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]