Lee Revell wrote:
The controversy over the introduction of CONFIG_HZ demonstrated the
urgency of getting a dynamic tick solution merged before 2.6.14.
Anyone care to give a status report? Con, do you feel that the last
version you posted is ready to go in?
Last time I got interested in this, the management of the event queues
was still a fairly major performance hit.
Has this overhead been brought down to reasonable levels?
Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |