Re: [patch 16/16] Add hardware breakpoint support for i386

Tom Rini <[email protected]> writes:

> This adds hardware breakpoint support for i386.  This is not as well tested as
> software breakpoints, but in some minimal testing appears to be functional.

This really would need so coordination with user space using 
them. Otherwise it'll be quite unreliable because any user program
can break it.

Long ago (in 2.4 time frame) there used to be a IBM patch floating
around to reserve them globally and user space to use specific ones. I
guess something like that would be needed again.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 16/16] Add hardware breakpoint support for i386
    • From: Tom Rini <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 15/16] Allow KGDB to work well with loaded modules
    • From: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
  • [patch 16/16] Add hardware breakpoint support for i386
    • From: Tom Rini <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 3/3] remove verify_area() - remove fs/umsdos/notes as it only contain a verify_area related note
• Next by Date: [PATCH 2/3] remove verify_area() - remove or edit references to verify_area in Documentation/
• Previous by thread: [patch 16/16] Add hardware breakpoint support for i386
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 16/16] Add hardware breakpoint support for i386
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]