Re: We also need to get rid of verify_area in entry.S

Jesper,

Thanks for the patches. I'll take a look at the entry.S one and will pass it along to Andres, and will incorporate the signal.c patch.

I am currently working on the system call interface and am removing the non-rt signal calls, so the signal.c patch probably doesn't apply cleanly anymore.

Thanks,
~Chris

Jesper Juhl wrote:

In addition to the patch I sent a few minutes ago, there's one last reference

to verify_area left in xtensa. It's in arch/xtensa/kernel/entry.S, and I'm going to need your help to get rid of that one since that code is over my head and I assume that the naive approach below would just break it :

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: We also need to get rid of verify_area in entry.S
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

• References:
  • We also need to get rid of verify_area in entry.S
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Where is the performance bottleneck?
• Next by Date: Oops in 2.6.13 (was Linux 2.6.13 )
• Previous by thread: We also need to get rid of verify_area in entry.S
• Next by thread: Re: We also need to get rid of verify_area in entry.S
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]