Re: Kernel 2.6.13-rc7 Latency Question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 8/27/05, Justin Piszcz <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> These options are self-explanatory:
> 
>       x x          ( ) No Forced Preemption (Server)                     x
> x    x x          ( ) Voluntary Kernel Preemption (Desktop)             x
> x    x x          (X) Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)          x x
> 
> 
> 
> It says 100 HZ or 250 HZ is good for SMP systems; however, what if I am
> using a P4 machine with 1 CPU (HT), is 1000HZ still the way to go, as its
> not really 2 *REAL* cpus?

I use 1000HZ on my P4 machine, HT enabled, staircase scheduler.

See LKML topic "Schedulers benchmark" if you want more
information/benchmarks results.

Regards,
Michal Piotrowski
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux