Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver, with probing.

From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:58:48 +0400

> What's the point of having unlikely() attached to every possible if ()?

If can result in smaller code, for one thing, even if it
isn't a performance critical path.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver, with probing.
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver, with probing.
    • From: Robert Love <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver, with probing.
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: process creation time increases linearly with shmem
• Next by Date: Re: process creation time increases linearly with shmem
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver, with probing.
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver, with probing.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]