Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver, with probing.

From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:58:48 +0400

> What's the point of having unlikely() attached to every possible if ()?

If can result in smaller code, for one thing, even if it
isn't a performance critical path.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver, with probing.
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver, with probing.
  - From: Robert Love <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver, with probing.
  - From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: process creation time increases linearly with shmem
Next by Date: Re: process creation time increases linearly with shmem
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver, with probing.
Next by thread: Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver, with probing.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]